An Honest Review (On iPhone 4S) – TimeTraks Review

So far, many, but not all, previous reviewers have demonstrated that they can not read, and do not know how an iPhone program nor the App Store works. First, the program works as advertised. The subscriptions work as advertised. The program is fast and does not (has not) crash. The program is ugly. The written history is done well, but I wish a more illustrative description of how to use the data was given. Missing is instruction of the meaning of the required time period input and how significant these periods affect the results. Time periods may not be known at all, or not precisely known. How should the user handle this input field? The interface works well, but is a bit stodgy. Could use an interface designers consult. Why is there 13 segments in the chronograph? Are these months, or simple divisions? Why 13. Is this a bug that has overlaid the years incorrectly and after say, 10yrs, the graph is actually 10mths behind? Some info by the authors needs to be included. Too bad there is no way to use your own dates for time matching. You can only time match using the search function (not favs.) and only with the celeb. database is consulted. Since the authors discuss the mathematical strength of using more than one date, three brings a much higher confidence level, why doesn't the program allow for multiple dates and the resultant chronograph. I should be able to match and compare three-four of my own dates. As it is, you can not compare, overlay, output or print a time-line, reducing the effectiveness of the program as I understand it. Either a better working explanation needs to be given or this feature added-in. Also, it would be nice to have some understanding of the underlying mathematical/foundational principals. As I said above, better help, built in to the various parts of the App. would be Very useful. All-in-all it works as advertised, but the efficacy of the data is unknown. …
Review by …abe on TimeTraks.