Merriam-Webster Dictionary Reviews – Page 8

5/5 rating based on 512 reviews. Read all reviews for Merriam-Webster Dictionary for iPhone.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary is free iOS app published by Merriam-Webster, Inc.

Professional writing

mo chances

Indispensable tool for critical thinking in print


Very disappointed

John John -12

I am very upset and disappointed with the 5.0.2 update. YOU TOOK AWAY THE SIMPLICITY AND UNDERSTANDABILITY OF THE USER INTERFACE!!! To be clear, the dictionary was the one NONNEGOTIABLE app I have kept on my phone for the last 5 years, and it is NOT the same experience with 5.0.2. And the word history scroll bar was taken away too. Can’t. Believe it. To me, ease of use is everything with the dictionary. I don’t want a new look or layout or feel, I just want familiarity, simplicity and the definition of a word!


Definition!!!

m.rshmr

All meaning forever......


Account Share/Syncing...

TechKnow77

I have a paid Android App account that is not accessible by Apple iOS application. Any near future capabilities? Otherwise, would probably rate higher... 3.5 for now...


Bad touch detection

王啸秋

The clicks are way too sensitive. Every time I wanted to click on “Thesaurus,” it goes back to homepage, it annoys me a lot.


Dear Merriam

YOONSI,YOUR BUDDY

I want to thank you for helping me understand my grammar and help me get some of my own ambitious vocabularies.So I would like you to keep improving this app and also, one last thing, I will help you get more people use this app.


Best dictionary of the English Language

Barbaro Haas

I use the platform everyday, a strong way to perform the meaning of language, communication. Thanks


Word of the day

whebevsmbd

This app teaches me so much fascinating words that I use in my everyday life.


Good dictionary

drcrxtcttctctcexy

The best dictionary easy to use


Horrible update

heje987992

I used to love this app. Until, that is, they changed their structure to only include bare-bones "collegiate definitions" unless you are willing to pay some fees to get full definitions and etymological information. This is quite concerning to me, as an issue of gatekeeping language itself based on financial disparities. I was happy to put up with advertisements when I could access full definitions--I understand that they have a right to make money off their service. I can't understand why they chose to instead double down on their profit-seeking and literally bar access to their own service which should be public domain ALWAYS.