财新—权威的财经新闻资讯 Reviews – Page 4

4/5 rating based on 126 reviews. Read all reviews for 财新—权威的财经新闻资讯 for iPhone.
财新—权威的财经新闻资讯 is free iOS app published by Caixin Media Co., Ltd

有节操的新闻媒体已经不多了

随便也不行吗

会不会有一天也步南方系后尘?


Hua 77

ccp的仆人


Restore purchase does not work

sooneloop

Attempted to restore with and without an Caixin account, and failed miserably. Meanwhile the subscription is still active from Apple perspective.


Caixin does not off much news at all, completely waste of my money

EmilyDas

caixin, as a news channel, does not offer much news at all. I’ve been reading the same news articles for days now. What a waste of my money to subscribe it for one month


Save the quality news with your money

nofreephotosoyousay

Hardly can you find much good quality news in China nowadays. We should cherish this one while it still lasts.


shame on you, Caixin

Cui2020Cui

Till apr 11 I was quite appreciated your coverage on coronavirus, and those journalists they deserved to be thanked. Today one of your journalist (former xinhua press) Yuan Suwen (苑蘇文), which violates professional journalism and whitewashes a rapist by reporting forged stories. Thanks to that I’ll no longer subscribe any of your products and uninstall this app at once. Shame on you, Caixin, who tries to harbor an evil rapist (as a lawyer, he kept abusing a 14-year-old girl for almost 5 years). Shame.


给恋童强奸犯洗地?really?????

趋势国信办

给恋童强奸犯洗地?really?????


高管性侵养女案一稿写得毫无底线

Emrys Z.

记者苑苏文你有新闻人的素养吗?


Caixin rationalize Bao Yuming's raping behavior

goroutao

In Caixin's special report《特稿|高管性侵养女案疑云》, it suggested that Bao's relationship with the 13-year-old victim was a romantic relationship between the suger daddy and his underage suger baby. In no way should a responsible media report a rape / sexual assault crime under investigation like that, with only testimony from the accused and trying its very best to rationalize the unacceptable criminal behavior.


Biased article and toxic values

cherie3000

The magazine described the rape victim, a 14-year-old girl as a shameless woman and described the criminal, a 45-year-old man as the sugar daddy in the case. The article author wrote the article without any evidence and regarded the crime as some disagreements between lovers ( a teenager and an old man? How dare you!). Was pedophilia included in your values? It is ridiculous how such a magazine is still alive.